The Case for Preservation in High Forest, Low Deforestation (HFLD) Jurisdictions

Login Contact Us

The Case for Preservation in High Forest, Low Deforestation (HFLD) Jurisdictions

The Case for Preservation in High Forest, Low Deforestation (HFLD) Jurisdictions

For years, the world has been seeking ways to preserve nature at scale. However, existing approaches have not been fully successful in achieving this.

The loss of existing forests is estimated to be about six times worse for the climate. If destroyed, they will release a much higher level of stored carbon into the atmosphere, ruin rich biodiversity and the habitats of millions, and could take decades or centuries to regenerate.

Our planet’s last intact forests are under mounting threat of irreversible, permanent loss if new approaches to protect them are not urgently supported.

There is a special classification for jurisdictions with high forest cover and low historical rates of deforestation.

Classified as ‘High Forest, Low Deforestation’ (HFLD), there are currently a dozen countries and nearly 40 subnational jurisdictions globally that, together, contain a quarter of the world’s existing forests. That’s close to a billion hectares of mainly intact forests, locking in billions of tonnes of carbon.

While nearly all forests will eventually face threats, carbon credits have, until recently, focused predominantly on areas that have already experienced high rates of deforestation. Perversely, this has meant that forests in HFLD jurisdictions were overlooked until they were under immediate threat or after they had been cut.

Soon, carbon credits from HFLD jurisdictions will be available under two reputable standards, ART-TREES and the World Bank FCPF, offering a market-based incentive to preserve nature at scale.

These credits will be available for investment and purchase, with the potential to protect some of the most critical forest areas remaining on the planet. Like other high-quality credits, these HFLD credits employ very conservative benchmarks to quantify the beneficial contribution of HFLD jurisdictions to global climate mitigation.

Carbon credits provide a readily available market-based solution for protecting intact forests at a time when ambitious action is urgently needed.

Climate Impact X, Conservation International, Emergent, Natural Climate Solutions Alliance and the Wildlife Conservation Society have come together to help ambitious companies make more informed decisions about using credits from HFLD jurisdictions within broader climate mitigation portfolios.

High Forest, Low Deforestation (HFLD) jurisdictions, such as those in the Tshuapa Province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, must be supported by substantial financial incentives to ensure the preservation of the invaluable biodiversity they harbour, and thus contribute to the global fight against climate change and the protection of nature and mankind.

(Translated from French)
Commenter Profile Image
Pancrace Boongo NkoyGovernor of the Province of Tshuapa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Corporate Buyers | Buy and retire verified Carbon Credits and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)

Buy and retire verified carbon credits and RECs with flexible procurement and deep market expertise to support sustainability goals.

Traders & Intermediaries | Premier carbon exchange in Singapore

Enhance trade execution and liquidity through robust market infrastructure and efficient settlement with a broad counterparty network.

Project Suppliers | Connect with global buyers for Carbon Credits and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)

Tap into a global network of buyers to secure spot or forward demand, while ensuring fair pricing for carbon credit and REC projects.

  • Same GOs, different rules: how national registries shape an audit-ready Scope 2 strategy

    Same GOs, different rules: how national registries shape an audit-ready Scope 2 strategy

    At first glance, Guarantees of Origin (GOs) appear broadly harmonised across Europe. They follow the European Energy Certificate System (EECS) rulebook operated by the Association of Issuing Bodies (AIB), and each certificate represents 1 megawatt hour of renewable electricity with a standard set of attributes. However, the registries behind those certificates do not all operate…

    Read Article: Same GOs, different rules: how national registries shape an audit-ready Scope 2 strategy
  • SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 carbon credits and RECs EACs

    SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0: What does it mean for your carbon credit and REC/EAC strategy?

    For years, uncertainty around the Science-Based Targets initiative’s (SBTi) position was one of the biggest brakes on corporate demand for carbon credits. That ambiguity is now gone. Last week, the SBTi published Version 2.0 of its Corporate Net-Zero Standard, and for the first time, it formally recognises carbon credit use in its framework through a…

    Read Article: SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0: What does it mean for your carbon credit and REC/EAC strategy?
  • CIX Gates India's Agri-carbon opportunity

    India’s Agri-Carbon Opportunity

    Executive Summary The agricultural sector is a central pillar of the Indian economy, employing 60 percent of the nation’s workforce and contributing to about 17 percent of its GDP. But for the millions of smallholder farmers across the country, a changing climate is making that reality increasingly precarious with rising temperatures, extreme weather events and…

    Read Article: India’s Agri-Carbon Opportunity